Best Of
Re: Violations at Tao Dan park
Pretty sure this is a vendetta or some sort of personal interest against the Pogo community that the author of this post is doing what he was doing. The Pokestops are by no means in violations 1st thing, that place is like our 1 greatest joy and gathering, with pokestops gone , gyms will get dragged along. Please do what is right and do not remove the Pokestops and just let the people enjoy the game. It is already hard enough for Pogo players nowadays to find a place to play and the Pokestops are as authentic as they can be so no obvious reasons to remove them.
Re: Slight Location Edit- Due to relocation
You posted this in the wrong place. You can either post it in the location edits section of the forum, or the better way to do it is to login to the wayfarer website, navigate to the help page, and then tap the orange speech bubble icon in the corner. That will open the support chat and one of the things you can do is request a location edit. You will need evidence to prove the move is valid.
Re: Violations at Tao Dan park
Threatening to mass abuse the report function against another player could potentially result in action being taken against your own account, just so you're aware. You are expected to keep things civil on the forum. So you may want to retract what you're saying.
Re: Private Appeal Process Needed
While we are not aware of what methods Aaron has made to ascertain the property line, the topic of easements have been mentioned here:
As it stands currently, the benchmark for reviewing on easements is unstable which makes it a bad benchmark. It is highly impractical to check each submission property line for easement debates, I see why it is wise to err to caution.
I do not see how this issue would be resolved if you were to make a video without the full context of this decision. Making a video centerred on a single comment from one data point (note: "in this case") may compound the issue of people submitting incorrectly.
I also watched your video on the topic and to rehighlight: 40m within said property does not extend outside of the property (regarding parks next to single-family residences). Linking the AMA Question:
Can you clarify the definition of “private residential property?” Are multi-family residences included in this rejection reason? What about Wayspots that are within 40m of a private residence?
The considerations when looking at private residential property have not changed with the criteria refresh. Considering that multi-family residences like apartment complexes can have publicly accessible amenities (like playground equipment), these could still be eligible as long as they meet all of the acceptance criteria. Nominations that appear to be within 40m of private, single-family residential property should be very closely reviewed to make sure they are not on private residential property, and that they are accessible from locations not on private residential property
The proceeding statements are my personal understanding: being responsible to a part of city property does not always equate to the property line extending to the easement, it may just a requirement for property owners set by the local agency to manage the public property. Highly impractical from a reviewer's standpoint still.
Re: Violations at Tao Dan park
half trash. This is our gathering place on weekends. you are not allowed to do this. Let's join hands to rp this account
Re: Pier dissapeared
According to this article, the lighthouse is undergoing temporary renovations at a remote location and has temporarily been replaced with another light:
https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2022/01/10/renovatie-vuurtoren-oosterstaketsel-oostende/
Edit: could be both are renovated, or just the one east, or west. Anyone from that place who knows?
Drake Village appeal
Title of the Wayspot: Drake Village sign
Location: 50.3912711, -4.1842159
City: Plymouth
Country: United Kingdom
Screenshot of the Rejection Email:
Photos to support your claim:
Additional information: I feel the rejection criteria were mistaken, The title is accurate as can be clearly seen in the photos, the niantic location map shows the bakery and barber mentioned in the description. It's also quite clear that this is not a temporary or seasonal installation and is a pretty distinct building.
Re: Are trailmarkers no longer good wayspots?
Generic street signs are ineligible - trails are promoted as a great place to exercise by Niantic.

