Looking for feedback for trail marker
EngineerNautic-PGO
Posts: 3 ✭✭
Hi,
I've tried several times now to nominate this trail marker for a great walking trail in the area, but it keeps getting rejected, first with reason of natural feature and now with reason of being of a person? Which I do not understand. Any ideas to improve my nomination? It should fall under the eligible criteria of walking trails?
Thanks in advance for any feedback!
Below the photos , description and additional information from the last rejected nomination.
Best Answer
-
LukeAllStars-ING
Posts: 4,622 Ambassador
such trailmarkers are most likely very hard to get accepted, even if they meet criteria. I think, @DerWelfe2205-PGO can tell you a long list of eligeble trailmarkers getting rejected. I would never upgrade such trailmarkers. Your named reasons both makes no sense, so dont listen to the rejection criteria.
Answers
such trailmarkers are most likely very hard to get accepted, even if they meet criteria. I think, @DerWelfe2205-PGO can tell you a long list of eligeble trailmarkers getting rejected. I would never upgrade such trailmarkers. Your named reasons both makes no sense, so dont listen to the rejection criteria.
Thank you very much for taking time to look at it and answering me. I just think it's very sad because there is a large area with awesome nature and history with no waypoints at all, that's why I upgraded this one twice already.. Somehow just feels demotivated by the fact that people are using random, trolling, reasons to turn it down when I'm always doing my very best to review fairly myself.
Phew.. got that off my chest 😅! Thanks!