Live animals

In recent weeks, I have received a more detailed e-mail when accepting or rejecting waypoints. And in my last email, my proposal was refused because there were live animals.
So explain to me where ? And above all, it is a small religious monument. Is the community so stupid as to confuse this monument with a dovecote ?
Comments
There are no anomals. Rejection reasons are not always accurate.
The object is behind the fence, so the accurate rejection reason will propably be "private property", if it is on a single family property.
Is that the only rejection reason?
The building that we can see there, is it a private house?
There is a cat or small dog in the rear of the yard. On the right side.
Also may be a bird at the bottom of the photo to the left of the base.
If the animal is not the focus of the picture (and I can't see any animals at all, so they are definitely not the focus even if they are there) then it's not reason to reject. Some locations like our riverside are hard to take a picture of without any birds in for example. If there's an eligible nomination with a couple of birds in the background I'd never reject for that!
Can we see the whole nomination?
Hard to tell. I would want to see the whole nomination to see if its private property or not.