Need for Grading Rubric for reiviewing Points Of Intrest

BBKROO-PGOBBKROO-PGO Posts: 2 ✭✭
in General Discussion

I'll try to write this without being too wordy. In the 'Criteria' tab that that has the sub tabs of Eligible, Acceptance, Rejection Criteria and Content Guidelines, the guidelines of the reviewing system still seems way too broadly subjective among a 5 star grading system. In college (and Army training schools), I preformed many projects and wrote many report papers (have a master's in nursing); using a Grading Rubric as a guideline. A Wikipedia definition of Rubric (academic): "a scoring guide used to evaluate the quality of students' constructed responses". Put simply, it is a set of criteria for grading assignments.

I believe that the there would be higher quality of Points of Interest [POI] submissions, easier for reviewers grade, and it would expedite many nominations to becoming Wayspots. I could go on how this could be, but people don't to read wordy statements.

· Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Answers

  • WillisDie-PGOWillisDie-PGO Posts: 15 ✭✭

    Also if you just revew with a binary tact as yes/no with 0/5 stars you will get flagged for bad behavior. So they seem to have some internal rubric of their own they are not sharing

    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • BBKROO-PGOBBKROO-PGO Posts: 2 ✭✭

    I forgot to add that there is a Rubric-ish type grading for 2 catagories: "Should this be a Wayspot "1 star for the ineligible criterias & in "Accuracy Location" 1 star for 'Can not be found', 3 for 'exist but obscured', 5 for 'found and accurate' (but what about 2 and 4) and how many meters/feet is considered a 4 and not a 5?

    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Sign In or Register to comment.