Feedback on rejected nomination
I would like to solicit feedback on why this nomination was rejected:
Title: Tietjens Hall
Description: Featuring the Sachs Electronic Music Studio and a large rehearsal hall, this academic building houses the Department of Music at Washington University in St. Louis.
Supplemental Information: This academic music building has unique cultural and artistic significance to the local community and is eligible according to Niantic’s submission guidelines. The location is pinned accurately and has easy public pedestrian access. Thanks for the review!
One reason was given for the rejection:
"Insufficient evidence that the nomination accurately reflects the submitted real-world location based on comparison of the submitted photo and map views, Nomination does not meet acceptance criteria."
However, this is clearly not true when one examines Google Streetview:
Do you all think that this is just a case of reviewers submitting the wrong rejection reason? Putting the reject reason aside, I do not understand why this nomination would be rejected in general. It has clear cultural and artistic significance to the community and is a named university building. There are POIs like this on virtually every college campus, including this one (i.e. there is strong precedent). I have submitted many nominations like this before and they always pass easily (i.e. community consensus). It has easy pedestrian access and the pin is correct. The primary photo is clear and the supplemental photo even shows the sign in the background so that reviewers can verify that the location is correct. Am I missing something?