Playground is a historical significant . What?
stephenstr1-ING Posts: 2 ✭✭
Title of the Wayspot: Синие детские качели
Location: 53.608667, 55.951444
Screenshot of the Rejection Email: [Attach Screenshot]
Photos to support your claim: [Attach photo]
Additional information: Hello everyone! Twice I sent a children's swing (in playground) and twice it was rejected with the reason “It is not a historical significant”. What will help to understand what is the problem?
New groups of reviewers have gained access to Wayfarer and are incorrectly rating it 1-star in the historical/cultural significance or visual uniquness categories without realizing that doing so is a rejection. The only thing that can be done about it is to continue educating new reviewers that a 1-star in any category is a rejection.
True and not true. I personally know a couple who gives 1⭐️ to all playgrounds. Reason: "oh it encourages pedophiles to go there". Sure in OPR test they gave 5⭐️ just to pass the test but later 1⭐️ was given (and is still given) to every single playground. Some people bring their own rules whilst not caring about NIA's guidelines.
(If the playground portals encourage pedophiles to go there, then they should refuse giving positive reviews to churches too. 😀)