Waystops from picnic parks rejected
007Jorginho-PGO
Posts: 48 ✭✭
What can I do to improve these rejected appointments?
[PT] Título: Parque de Merendas da Lagoa das Queridas
[EN] Title: Picnic Park of Lagoa das Queridas
[PT] Título: Parque de Merendas da Sanguinheira
[EN] Title: Picnic Park of Sanguinheira
[PT] Descrição: Parque de Merendas e de Lazer da Sanguinheira
[EN] Description: Sanguinheira Picnic and Leisure Park
[PT] Informação complementar: Parque de Merendas e de Lazer da Sanguinheira, com um parque verde à volta, mesas para merendas e um parque infantil para as crianças
[EN] Additional information: Picnic and Leisure Park of Sanguinheira, with a green park around, picnic tables and a playground for children
Comments
When someone submits a "Park" reviewers usually look for a sign or entrances with the park's name on it.
You may want to change the titles of your nominations to what the physical object in the photo is. Like your first example could be a "Picnic Shelter" or "Grilling Shelter". And the second one could be "Picnic Plaza" (Though a gathering of picnic tables usually end up being rejected no matter what without some kind of shaded structure). You'd be better off submitting the playground or any pavilions/shelters in the area if there are any nearby.
These sorts of seating areas or picnic tables are notmally considered ineligible - mass produced generic seats of no interest. Find some other things in the park to submit.
Unfortunately, these parks do not have the name of the place (park) at the entrance, but it is possible to confirm that these nominations are real. I will accept your suggestion and in the next request of these 2 places I will name them "picnic areas", also looking for a better angle to take the photos for of these Waystops nominations. Thank you very much for your suggestions!
I was also not expecting these nominations to be rejected, but next time I will name these 2 places "picnic areas", also looking for a better angle to take the photos for of these Waystops nominations.
Since you are going to resubmit, I would try to get better lighting, especially in the second submission. That photo is very dark and hard to distinguish what you're looking at. Try to give reviewers as little as possible to find fault with.
Unfortunately, there are days that it is difficult to take good pictures due to the weather, especially when the sky is very white or gray, but I will take your suggestion into consideration too, thank you very much!
The first one, with a roof, might be possible.
The second one is just mass-produced tables and stools. Looks like the break area for an office building. Common, not a place you'd take a visitor to your town.
Regarding the second image, it has nothing to do with what you said. It is a rest, leisure and picnic area in a rural area, but with a different style of the picnic parks that we are used to in this type of means. What did you say look like an "office building", is a wall that separates the park area from the land of a house. On this side of the wall, there is a small building that contains a barbecue, a washbasin and a bench. For the reasons that I presented earlier, it is not a "common" place, being a great place to take a visitor, also having a playground, an outdoor fitness park, among other things.