Playground in a Family-Friendly Club
HaramDingo-ING
Posts: 1,725 ✭✭✭✭✭
My most frustrating rejection is this playground. It was rejected for not meeting criteria, pedestrian access and explicit content. I don't understand what is explicit about this area (it's the brand new iteration of the Parramatta RSL) and it's a great little playground which is accessible to visitors of Club Parramatta, a family-friendly establishment. If this was a sex-on-premises place or a brothel, why would anyone invest in a playground, so you can drop your children off here while they have some hot times?
I seriously do not understand the pedestrian access reason. It is located just outside the club in the open space and there are stairs leading to this, as well as a ramp. This playground is much more intriguing than other generic playgrounds and should have the same importance as the rest without this bullcrap rejection reasons.
Does it really not meet criteria? Or are there any ways to improve it? Why would someone take a nice photograph of something that does not have pedestrian access?
Comments
Explicit content could just have been 1 reviewer clicking the reason wrongly, or accidently. If even 1 person clicks it, it will show up in the reasons given.