Explicit or inappropriate activity, the new Generic Business
JaxomNC-ING
Posts: 13 ✭✭
I seem to experience a shower of
review bombs lately with plenty of nomination rejected under "The real-world location of the nomination appears to have explicit or inappropriate activity":
- a video game store
- a board game store (that has a playroom)
- the local costume shop heavily visited by the local Cosplay community
- a Jehovah witnesses meeting hall
- an historical canon (in the entrance hall of a 20+ stories tower)
- ...
Several of those have also been marked as "private residence property or farm" which is completely the opposite of being a business with an explicit activity...
Couple examples of those nominations:
Tagged:
Comments
Show the entire submissions, including what you put for text. Just looking at the two pictures provided, there is obvious room for improvement.
Lol, no need to, I am pretty sure most educated people can figure out out these are not XXX stores or booze or weapons selling places. Tell me if you need some more help figuring out the nature of those 2 photos.
Welcome to the explicit content club. Did you know that in Spanish, the rejection emails actually have the word séxual in it? It's nuts. I don't think reviewers would ever submit something of such nature. In the case that it actually did, maybe Niantic should address it right at the point.
If you are unwilling to improve or atleast show your nominations it makes it seem that your nominations could have been very poor. Let me guess you may skipped passed the “does not meet criteria” rejection reason?