Personalized watermarks?
Recently I've started seeing watermarks that look like this:
I'm wondering if this should be rejected simply as a watermarked photo, or rather as a personal identification mark due to the name (I've seen both names and what seems to be usernames - such as in the example above - on this kind of watermarks). What do you think?

Comments
Does it matter?
One is an abuse rejection and possible reason for an abuse report, one isn't.
just watermark. i hate the person that put that into those smartphone cameras by default.
Yeah when I get those i just mark those photos as not acceptable and leave whatever else.
"Ineligible photo
Photo includes one or more of emojis, tags, or personally identifiable information such as codenames, personal names or initials, or addresses; copyrighted material or watermarks, including screenshots of someone else's photo; is obviously doctored; includes people, body parts, or live animals as the subject matter; is blurry, over/under exposed, taken inside a car, contains a watermark, or is improperly oriented."
So if someone is trying to add a watermarked photo or somehow submitted a new wayspot with a watermarked photo its a reject.