It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
Sign In with Ingress Sign In with Pokémon GO
Good morning I have been rejected this nomination of Shopping Center ...
1. Visible plates (one comes out and is illegible, blurred)
2. Private property. Excuse me?
3. Does not meet criteria ...
What is your opinion?
It simply doesn't meet any of the eligibility criteria.
Forgive me if I am in error, but if I think I meet criteria
It's just a row of stores. It is not a place where it is inteneded for people to socialize.
Entonces, todos los Centros Comerciales que ya son wayspots... deben de ser denunciados para su eliminación?
Only if they meet the removal criteria.
If you tell me that mine is not valid because it is a row of stores (It is not true by the way, inside there are more stores and businesses) ... the rest of Shopping Centers are also a handful of stores, right?
Forgive me but I don't see the difference
Is there anything in the shopping centre that actually encourages people to socialize, or is it a row of stores meant for only shopping.
Dont orientate nominations off of passed accepted wayspots. Criteria over time changes which could change how things were accepted at one point vs now
Approval criteria is different than the Removal criteria. So maybe something is no longer a valid nomination, but that's not a reason to remove existing wayspots.
A shopping mall might have a mural, a statue, a unique place to eat, a video game or comic store, a play area or something like that. Nominate a specific thing that meets the criterias.
Those were mistakenly approved due to a previous miscommunication and misunderstanding. Ninatic later clarified that the location must be a public meeting space and not simply a row of stores. Second, the eligibility and removal criteria are two separate entities. Wayspots will only be removed if they meet the removal criteria, even if those same Wayspots no longer meet or never did meet the eligibility criteria.