Trail sign - Location appears to have explicit or inappropriate activities

I nominated a POI in November, it was in fact one of my first nominations, and since it's close to where I live and the review process has been going on for six months, I decided to upgrade it. (BTW, I have several nominations from November 2020 that are still in the reviewing process, is this normal?)

My nomination was rejected because the real world location appears to have inappropriate activities. I must say this is the most amusing rejection so far.

This sign might not be the most interesting object in the world, but I still don't understand why it was rejected. Seems like a lot of reviewers haven't gotten the memo regarding trail markers. Should I explain that the trail also goes through villages and forests in addition to the coast line?

Any help is appreciated!


Comments

Sign In or Register to comment.