It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
Sign In with Ingress Sign In with Pokémon GO
Country/City: Taiwan/New Taipei City
Screenshot of the Rejection Email:
Photos to support your claim:
It should be removed.
Appeal Denied - Thanks for the appeal, Agent. We took another look at the Portal in question and decided that it does not meet our criteria for removal at this time.
So long as it is a recent addition to the game board it should be removed following your own (NIA) clarification @NianticGiffard
Here's our stand on it, there are no changes from our previous clarification on Military bases: https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/discussion/comment/32414/#Comment_32414
Unless @NianticCasey-ING is wrong?
Unless @NianticCasey-ING already left this forum. Niantic still stand with the statement however no further clarification has spoken by them.
This has been asked multiple times in AMAs but Niantic choose to "evade" those questions. There are also threads related to the topic yet turned into endless debate and @NianticGiffard decided to close the threads without spoke any further words.
Hi, @NianticGiffard .
As shown in Google Street View, the
The white letters on the asphalt road are a message that forbids you to enter the military area.
Actually, what Casey said is that your are not supposed to approve new ones, but he didn't say "recent additions" would be removed. Niantic's logic is a bit confusing sometimes.
Since you won't remove any old portals in military bases, and you won't remove new subs in military bases if they manage to get accepted, wouldn't it be better to just publicly announce that Military Bases are now allowed? Because they already are, your gang "SUGGESTS" not to accept them but if reviewers ignore your suggestions (and rightfully so), then the portals remain. Might as well save yourself future embarrassment and just announce your stance change.
I'm also getting frustrated with this as a reviewer. I've voted to reject several portals on military bases lately, only to come to another one in review and seeing the ones I rejected on the map.
Yeah, exactly. A system that actively penalizes people who follow the rules should be the BIGGEST red flag that it needs to change. Now we only have to wait until Niantic'o'clock for them to care.
Ha ha you are right......all I meant by "recent additions" was post NIA clarification. NIA could resolve this never ending returning issue quite easily but you gotta love NIA and their priorities!
Based on that this portal should not have existed.
Same for https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=51.472767,5.375254&z=17&pll=51.472767,5.375254
Luckily only 1 is "in use"
In other parts of the country we have the opposite situation. we controle portals on places like that.
In my opinion all should be removed. Old and NEW.