why was this rejected?
EdeImarzipan-PGO
Posts: 18 ✭✭
it qualifies as
"Unusual or unique local shops"
"Popular restaurants"
from https://wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/criteria#eligibility
link is https://www.wildland.de/
EdeImarzipan-PGO
Posts: 18 ✭✭
it qualifies as
"Unusual or unique local shops"
"Popular restaurants"
from https://wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/criteria#eligibility
link is https://www.wildland.de/
Comments
Hotels are not eligible.
thats missinformation. You probably refere to "A generic business, chain, or franchise that is not locally unique" which is not the case here.
No, hotels, in general, are not eligible. There are more discussions about this topic. The first three examples I found:
https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/discussion/14507/are-hotels-and-vacation-places-acceptable
https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/discussion/893/more-clarification-for-hotels
https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/discussion/comment/49166#Comment_49166
@LukeAllStars-ING is correct. There is a reason for these to be acceptable. If they are notable in some way or if they’re historical. They’re not just acceptable as a hotel though
yeah all three say hotels are eligible when cultural relevant. I provided a link to the homepage and a link to a recommendation for the poi. its labeled as area typical unique architecture from the 16th century and has offers for tours through the lokal nature reserved hut willow.
"its labeled as area typical unique architecture from the 16th century"
Then have your main photo BE the building and its unique architecture rather than a generic and un-inspiring sign.
thanks I should try that. The sign shows the nature reserve animal of the hut willow. Maybe I describe the meaning of the bird and request both 🤭