Acceptance criteria.
Martmitemon-PGO
Posts: 5 ✭✭
This nomination has been rejected due to the following reason(s):
Nomination does not meet acceptance criteria.
this was the reason why this was rejected in less than 2 hours after getting an upgrade.
It’s a lovely little bumble bench in a park.
I can’t find the acceptance criterion/criteria it does not meet.
Comments
What criteria are you saying it meets? What was your supporting statement? Need more info to understand why you believe it to be an acceptable nomination.
Are "bumble benches" a thing? I tried Google but got a lot about some weird benches from a dating app company.
I would try to make the photo better by taking it from above if possible. So the reviewers can see that it is shaped as a bee. It’s not very clear right now. Looks cute and visually unique.
I can’t find the acceptance criterion/criteria it does not meet.
Perhaps you should instead start with which eligibility criteria the object does meet. Because if the reviewers don't see which eligibility criteria it meets, then they will (rightfully) reject it.
Generic bench - I gave it a 1* - does not meet criteria rating.
TBH how many benches do you see that are this shape? I have to say I've never seen one this shape. So how can it be generic?
If you mean that you actually don't know where to find the acceptance criteria, they are here:
We still need to see the rest of your nomination (title, description, and supporting information) to see what context you provided to reviewers. I think it could perhaps meet the exploration criteria as a piece of art--if it is a piece of art--but it would help if you could provide an appropriate explanation of the background of the bench (who was the artist, when was it installed, etc.). I also agree that a higher angle on the photo would be helpful, as the "bee" is kind of hard to see from this angle.
Does not meet eligibility criteria
Does not seem to be a great place of exploration, place for exercise, or place to be social. The object is mass-produced, generic, or not visually unique or interesting.
I also blame the image for not selling the relevance of this. It should be engaging and appear unique, but this low view doesn’t do it any justice. Take from up high, a few feet from the tail end of the bee, square (wings straight left and right, head straight up) and centered so that nobody could ever mistake it for something dull.
Personally I passed this one. I've never seen a bench like this before, and I live somewhere where the Bee 'symbol' is adopted into all manner of logos, art, merchandise, etc. I certainly wouldn't call it "generic". Seems quite unique to me. Yes, maybe the photo could be better but it's pretty clearly a bee.
As far as I remember the bench was in a small park surrounded by houses. So I would say it meets the criteria as both a place to exercise and socialise with others.