2 nominations are dissaproved but I do not understand why
Hi,
I have 2 nominations that got rejected with the following e-mail "Nomination does not appear to be permanent or appears to be a seasonal display that is only put up during certain times of the year, Nomination does not meet acceptance criteria."
One of them is a powerhouse, and yes, a LOT of powerhouses are Waypoints throughout the city, so mine is no different.
My description:
The Vincent van Goghstraat is a street divided in two parts. Right in the middle there is a powerhouse. It is also a point of orientation for people that get lost in this area
2nd one that got rejected is a piece of art that has been here for over a decade, it got rejected by the same reason, that it is a seasonable display.
This is my description:
This artwork of blocks of marble are designed for the hospice at the Vincent van Goghstraat by architect Rene van Doorn. There are 3 blocks describing the struggle and the work for people in their last few days of their life.
What am I doing wrong?
Comments
a power-house is really a generic thing. If it hasn't been painted on (and not just a 2 second graffiti tag) it doesn't meet any criteria, correct to reject them.
The second one: is it visible on streetview ? If it's there for over 10 years it should be. They seem just to be placed on the pavement, not anchored to the ground which might confuse reviewers. A marble block of that size is not easily moved. What did you use as supporting picture ?
@KramRekked-PGO The powerhouse is a definite rejection, there's nothing interesting about it.
The artwork has merit, but has some problems:
The hospice seems well-established so if possible, take your supporting photo from a distance, with the artwork AND the hospice in clear view.