Reviewers reject e-ve-ry-thing
What is wrong with some reviewers?
A public dance sports hall was rejected for "private property"??
A community health service because of "temporary display"??
The entrance of a park rejected because of 'does not meet criteria'??
All were on street view and were named on Google maps! The amount of rejections is completely insane (except for dull trail markers with a number and an arrow).
This is not ok, this lottery is really disappointing. Can 1 idiot reviewer really have a kind of veto by giving 1 star because that's the fastest way to review? This is not making the game any better.