Help with "fake" church
Recently, I had a church rejected for being fake and for not being visually unique.
Supporting Statement: Church where the local community goes for worship and also socialise after every service.
I don't understand. The church is real, it can be verified in Street View. The church at the front has an interesting brick mosaic and it does have a presence. Yeah mind the fact that it's another one of those churches that have leases in an industrial complex but it should be noticeable.
I legitimately do not understand why this nomination is not visually unique. There are two other churches within 500m (Revelations Church and St. Bartholomew's Church) but they are far apart and away between other nominations in the area.
Is it a matter of reviewers just pulling my leg and trolling or is this nomination not good enough? I've already resubmitted this but I was hoping if anyone had any suggestions or constructive advice to get this over the line.