Exercise facility confused with a cemetery?

Dadbert51-PGODadbert51-PGO Posts: 5 ✭✭
edited October 2021 in Nomination Improvement

How could this be rejected?

Screen Shot 2021-10-17 at 3.36.55 PM.png
Screen Shot 2021-10-17 at 3.59.47 PM.png


Screen Shot 2021-10-17 at 3.39.46 PM.png
Screen Shot 2021-10-17 at 3.46.03 PM.png


"This nomination has been rejected due to the following reason(s):

Insufficient evidence that the nomination accurately reflects the submitted real-world location based on comparison of the submitted photo and map views, The real-world location of the nomination appears to be sensitive (e.g. non-historic or culturally significant gravestones or cemeteries), The real-world location of the nomination could not be confirmed to have an acceptable pedestrian pathway leading up to it."

It doesn't even remotely resemble a gravestone or cemetery. Sensitive location? Seriously?

Screen Shot 2021-10-17 at 3.42.26 PM.png


"The real-world location of the nomination could not be confirmed to have an acceptable pedestrian pathway leading up to it."

Did the reviewer even look at the Google map location?

Screen Shot 2021-10-17 at 3.46.03 PM.png

I realize now that I placed the pin location away from the building, but I can't see how this is a sensitive location nor do I see (as supported from the Google map above) a sidewalk lacking outside the gym. Any suggestions where I went wrong? Does this rejection merit an appeal? Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.

Post edited by NianticGiffard on
· Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Comments

Sign In or Register to comment.