Exercise facility confused with a cemetery?
How could this be rejected?
"This nomination has been rejected due to the following reason(s):
Insufficient evidence that the nomination accurately reflects the submitted real-world location based on comparison of the submitted photo and map views, The real-world location of the nomination appears to be sensitive (e.g. non-historic or culturally significant gravestones or cemeteries), The real-world location of the nomination could not be confirmed to have an acceptable pedestrian pathway leading up to it."
It doesn't even remotely resemble a gravestone or cemetery. Sensitive location? Seriously?
"The real-world location of the nomination could not be confirmed to have an acceptable pedestrian pathway leading up to it."
Did the reviewer even look at the Google map location?
I realize now that I placed the pin location away from the building, but I can't see how this is a sensitive location nor do I see (as supported from the Google map above) a sidewalk lacking outside the gym. Any suggestions where I went wrong? Does this rejection merit an appeal? Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.