Playground
Tufkas-PGO
Posts: 20 ✭✭
A big playground surrounded by 10-floor-appartment-buildings in a big city is a good wayspot.
My submission of a small playground surrounded by 3-floor-appartment-buildings in a small village is "private property"..... for the fourth time!
Where's the difference?!?
Comments
The problem with his on is it looks like a PRP garden, and the one bit of play equipment does not look like a commercial (Councils by this sort of thing) swing - it look like something you order yourself from Amazon for your kids.
Without seeing your supporting photo and nomination detail, it's had to say what more can be done. For something as "borderline looking" as this then you really do need some sort of "official" sign or notice to prove it is a proper playground, not just a home swing on a bit of grass.
To be fair, without being able to see the rest of the nomination, that does look very much like a swing in someone's back garden.
If I look carefully there appears to be one of the rocking spring things which do tend to be in proper play areas which need to be fixed in the ground. But the main focus is a single swing which does look what an individual might buy. So if there are other items of equipment it might be better to focus (closeup) on them.
it does look like something u can setup yourself private and not made by local authorities.. i would reject that too based on photo looks.
Without seeing the map or supporting image my first thought was private property back garden swing set.
I love how the complaint that people decide to reject on the basis of just the first picture is common, but we are supposed to get outraged about a rejection with the same level of information.
It looks very much like a fenced in backyard with the info given. If there were some way within the supporting information photo to help show that it is not in fact someone's backyard, that would probably go a long way