I feel honestly fooled
XdelsonX-PGO
Posts: 12 ✭✭
For real, you sit there sometimes a hour and rate suggestion after suggestion to work on your upgrade - and then your own suggestions gonna be declined. For no reason. A house facade with a brand new wonderful picture from a Forest with animals. You can CLEARLY see on the second picture free access for pedestrians on the sidewalk. Declined as private land.
Suggestion for an old house wall with sculpture motifs. Declined as „other rejection criteria“ and wrong place. Second picture showed sidewalk for free access and (!) the name of the street. Same as the POI was pinned on map. But ofc wrong place, yeah yeah.
an Infoboard from a church, which could be a really important and interesting place for some villages - declined as sender identifiable and temporary and saisonale establishment. No face or something else on the picture for the POI. both pictures not. Bell Tower from same church was okay. Can’t be stolen quickly like an infoboard, such a tower ;)
wasnt the first time to get suggestions declined for no real reason. Ofc those decliners are ppl are his own suggestions was declined cuz they submit some nonsense like on a walk found insignificant rock and placed the POI at their house for a Homestop.
Happens not once. Not twice. Every try different pictures, could be something doesn’t fit for someone. But everything it meets all criteria, show surroundings .. really this no longer holds me anymore if this stupid nonsense decline not getting stopped.
this can’t be. decline interesting and visually unique POI .
For. No. Reason.
Comments
Hello @XdelsonX-PGO and welcome to the wayfarer forum.
Can you share with us the details of your submissions via some screenshot ?
Given what you said of your nomination, the first two seems to be ineligible for being on PRP.
What do you mean, inenligible (PRP)? What’s wrong on an old house Fassade or an picture at the wall?
Please clear my mind and explain me. Here are some more house Fassade and big wall pictures as stop/arena. Some very old, some are few days/weeks old. Ty
this is the one with street name. Ofc now if you zoom not readable. -.- it is on normal picture
Is that first one a block of flats? If yes I’d make really clear in the nomination otherwise it would be ineligible for being a single family dwelling. (Sorry if you’ve already made that clear, my German isn’t good at all 🙈) Same with the sculpture motifs, although I would also not think they might not be notable enough. I do think that the reasons that come through may not always be exactly the reason the reviewers selected for whatever reason as well, which doesn’t help.
If the house is a single family dwelling, then that is grounds for rejection. Even if it's on an outward facing wall that's next to a public street, it is still part of the property and thus ineligible.
If the building is apartments/flats rather than a single family house, then things in communal areas for those buildings are OK, but you'll need to make sure the reviewer is aware that they're not a single family dwelling.
^^ those was ppl with **** days. Look around our other Pokestops
Some old, some new. We ARE a distric with many old sculpture motifs and THIS makes US.
the Forest picture is a block of flats, yes. 3 or 4 houses lined up to next each other with several parties. Same as the flower thingy.
Could understand a decline as not unique visual - even they are look different. But idk, what should a district of OLD and HISTORY nominate else for a POI. Not understanding this, sorry.
Those aren’t single dwelling houses.
The painting over the front of the flats is a meh to ok candidate, its not bad but thats it, id rate it 3 / 4 *
The rest are all 1* candidates and have been correctly rejected, that others are already in the game doesnt mean that others should be accepted.
I don’t expect something like that to be accepted just because something like that already exists in game.
the painting ^^ don’t kidding me, as it’s not a thing you want to see. A pretty painting ART on power boxes at the street, on a wall or something else. It’s always an eye catcher, that’s the meaning of works like this, city’s intention to beautify it that way. We don’t have 10000 of the same boring walk/hiking/biking route signs every 20mtr like nederlands/Belgium etc. ofc it’s criteria for moving people but you nearly don’t see any other in voting next to nice Mosaic ART stones.
In this meaning could decline everything cuz not worth.
Would ppl take a look on Streetview if possible (what it is 99% in a city) they could see it’s not a single dwelling house. But overwhelming of voters have no lust and whose setting comes across as like „ mh no yes idk next“ no sense. Always a proof cuz many of „choose title description location“ where are people or license plates are VERY good to see/read.
I really like the forest mural, but as the others said it’s ineligible if it’s a private residence. If that’s an apartment building or dorms or a hostel or some such, then you should include the name of the building in the title and description to make it clear what reviewers are dealing with. If you can find the name of the artist and the date it was painted, those kinds of details make things even more real for reviewers.
As for those little architectural details, I would vote against those every time. I find them totally insignificant. If you believe local reviewers are more likely to accept them, then don’t upgrade those nominations (upgrades take nominations to a broader geographical area for review, while un-upgraded leaves them with a more localized group).
And like I said, it isn’t private or something like this. It can be seen on second picture and LATEST way on Streetview, which 99% available in a city. This house is unlucky censored on Streetview, however you can see the other houses exactly on the one POI. if the voter a little bit interested in serious voting they can see it’s a street near a park and so it is a Main Street for walks. This picture is getting seeing often.
i know how to describe a picture, if I have informations. I could only find out for the forest, that was done from a local art and culture club. No matter, it is pretty nice and a point that WANTS to be seen.
for those little architectural details, this is history. Old houses, which are still standing. They don’t did. those things w/o a reason plenty of years ago on a housewall. It was chic and it is today chic. It is historic. Essen was in WW2 bombed and nearly no more existent (ofc not all ppl know this) and THOSE houses with little architectural details aus still something that should be pointed out today. It’s like an old colliery, why are they still there for a walk or investigating? Yeah, historic.
Fact is, if I don’t upgrade my suggestions they NEVER leaved the queue. Always in queue. And damn, I voted sometimes really much. Upgrade = in voting. I don’t understand it. And then any plebs disrespect. history. Cultur. Art.
it’s still the point like my first post above. I can’t unterstand it. I decline everything for no reason cuz it is not worth for me for no reason I need to have.
I guess we don’t come together. Ty anyway. I am still in my mind from first post, it is not properly rated what I already have seen waved through. Stupid **** POI‘s.
i have got a permanent circus tent declined for not being permanent . it actually has a marker on google maps too. it is a youth centre
A tent isn't a permanent structure and a youth centre isn't a valid location.
The submission of proposals that do not meet the criteria need not be discussed. You can inquire beforehand. But instantly rejecting proposals for the wrong reasons is another matter.
well, what the heck - everything is just kidding in this club anyway. 👎️