Subdivision Signs on single house property
when you cant tell if the sign is on public property, is it considered private property?
or is it as simple as no sidewalk = reject
when you cant tell if the sign is on public property, is it considered private property?
or is it as simple as no sidewalk = reject
Comments
Most of the time it doesn't really matter, because a subdivision sign almost never meets any of the acceptance criteria. I just reject them under "other rejection reasons" without needing to look very carefully at the private single-family residential property rules.
If you can't tell if its on PRP or not then personally I would reject it. As to this nomination, its a 1* for other rejection criteria, as its not a worthwile candidate before even considering its PRP status pedestrian access
Both AND the fact that it also doesn't meet any of the eligibility criteria. As for which specific reason you chose, that depends on your personal preferences. I usually go in sequence of eligibility -> acceptability -> rejection. In this case, that would mean "doesn't meet eligibility criteria" is first since it is the most basic requirement for all nominations, "safe pedestrian access" is second since it is a requirement of the acceptability criteria, and "private residential property" is third since this is only listed in the rejection criteria.