[Suggestion] Terminate review of terrible nominations
auntergoaf-PGO Posts: 159 ✭✭✭✭
edited December 2021 in December AMA - 2021
For example, let's say that all the review items need to exceed 3 stars for approval and need to be reviewed by 100 people.
When the number of reviews reaches 75 (3/4 of the required number), if the total number of stars for a certain review item does not exceed 175, it will not reach the approval line even if the remaining 25 reviewers all give it 5 stars.
The 25 judges do not affect the decision to approve or disapprove, so it is really a waste of effort. If these 25 people review other nominations, they can be expected to shorten the waiting time. So, in such cases, it is okay to terminate the review process in the middle.
Is it possible to introduce this system?
Agreed. Either terrible nominations, or immediately start looking into nominations flagged as abusive (especially photos and edits) once a trend starts to appear, manually reject or take them out instead of having 100% of required reviewers pass some sort of quota before a clear decision is made.