Skiing chair lifts waypoint eligible or not?
During reviewing I've recently come across submits of skiing chair lifts (Photo of the lift's top or bottom get on area). Not sure how to rate them. I don't think they are a point of interest. (I personally wouldn't go travel for the purpose of seeing the ski lifts of the world.) Could they fall under promote exercise? Any thoughts? Thanks.
Post edited by yanghao1-ING on
Comments
Note I forgot to add: one ski lift submitter said this falls under "Place to be social" criteria. But isn't that more for places like coffee shops? Thanks again.
It definitely wouldn't fit into the "great places to socialize" category as this is not a place you want people to loiter around at. If it fit any of the categories, it would be "great places to exercise". But even then, I think the slops themselves (with the Wayspot located at the top of the ****) are far better candidates.
Agree that the **** is the place to exercise but it still needs an anchor. Just like you wouldn't submit a random trail in the woods, but you would rather submit the trailmarker at the anchor for the wayspot, i think submitting the ski lift for the anchor of a ski **** is a good compromise.
apparently "sl0pe" is a bad bad word. VVTF ****!
It's one letter away to the most insulting word in french for prostitutes. Maybe that's why ?
(And it's fun prostitutes are an ok topic, not a ban word ^^, maybe it's something eligible !)
Seems redundant after several people said it, already, but a trail sign or a ski lift should typically be acceptable as the visual marker for the sIope itself - but not really for the "social" aspect. The sIopes would be more for exercise and the lodge could be social and/or exploration.
I would probably vote to approve a chair lift at a ski resort if everything else (images, text, pin) looked good.