Nomination and screening decisions when multiple identical objects are spaced a certain distance apa
tp235-ING
Posts: 1,383 ✭✭✭✭✭
Please forgive me for calling you before the Christmas holiday.
The other day, when I was reviewing a work, I received a nomination that I was having trouble understanding.
I would like to confirm what criteria should be used to make a decision, as I have seen similar nominations in the past.
I thought it would be difficult to understand if I just explained it in words, so I made a conceptual diagram.
Let's start with Figure 1. I used Pokémon for this purpose. But it is a concept. I'm not reviewing the pictures of Pokémon.
Figure1
Assume that there are several candidates along the road.
If no two of them are the same, they are candidates for the quality to be approved.
If you check along this road, there is a different candidate every 50 meters, and some of them have already been approved.
But if you look closely, you can see that they are aligned in a certain way.
Let's say they are 250m apart.
In this case, which decision should I take?
(1) Examine each candidate and judge them as different spots even if they have the same design.
(2) Even if they are separated by a certain distance, they should be considered as the same candidate and considered as duplicates.
(3) Reject it as a mass-produced product.
In addition, there is a reason for "duplication" in the deletion criteria.
I would like to know if this will result in deletion when I submit a request for deletion.
Next, let's go to Figure 2.
Think of it as a diagram of a city.
Figure 2
Assume that there are several candidates and existing wayspots for the same pattern, but in different locations, in the middle of an intersection or city street.
This is also a candidate for quality that will be approved if there are no identical objects.
The city block is assumed to be 100m x 200m.
In this case, which decision should be taken?
(1) Examine each candidate and judge them as different spots even if they have the same design.
(2) Consider them as the same candidate even if they are separated by a certain distance and consider them as duplicates.
(3) Rejected as a mass-produced product.
In addition, there is a reason for "duplication" in the deletion criteria.
I would like to know if this will result in deletion when I submit a request for deletion.
In my opinion, the decision will be (2) or (3), and even if the existing wayspot is not deleted, I think it should be summarized, but I would appreciate your opinion.
Comments
The following is an additional explanation.
Think of the existing way spots and the nominated candidates as being exactly the same thing, only the locations are scattered at regular intervals.