TheFarix-PGO Posts: 4,215 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited March 2022 in April AMA - 2022
A trend I've seen lately is that whenever someone complains about "bad reviewers" and "wrong rejections" and have their example nominations critiqued by the community, the individual(s) ends up blowing up and becomes toxic towards those providing the critique with one say that the examples should not be evaluated on their acceptability. The question is, are we allowed to critiqued examples of those complaining about having their nominations rejected, or should we stop providing feedback in the inevitable event that the individual will become toxic when they are told that their nomination(s) isn't as good as they thought it was?
Post edited by NianticTintino-ING on
Honestly, half of the ones that people aren't happy got rejected are fine with advice on how to improve it, and if it's not eligible, most accept it when it's explained to them why its not eligible. If some do become toxic then the question should be "should niantic quickly shut down submission discussions if they are becoming toxic"