Do you think the current test is helping you understand the criteria?
The current test is a simplified nomination review with description, supporting information, and supporting photos omitted. The questions are so one-note and there is no test on editing and photo reviews so even if they passed I don't think they would understand half of the criteria.
How many new judges know that it is acceptable to include URLs in the supporting information, that supporting photos may be edited, and that photos with a little light or shadow on the subject are acceptable?
Could you improve the content of the test?