Misplaced wayspots on purpose.
NoctaD-PGO
Posts: 128 ✭✭✭
When submitting an appeal, please use the below format:
Title of the Wayspot: Juego Circular / Sube y baja Bicolor
Location: -34.192447,-70.746529 / -34.192218,-70.747
City: Rancagua
Country: Chile
Screenshot of the Rejection Email: there was no rejection email, it's useless to report these edits via in game cause they take ages to be reviewed and they can also be easily manipulated by the dozens of multiaccounts that exist in Pokemon Go.
Photos to support your claim:
Additional information: These 2 wayspots were misplaced I believe for them to show in Pokemon Go because of their cell positioning. You can also note that these two street views "1" and "2" were also manipulated in order to get the POIs accepted cause the real location is where I drew the green circle, as the 3 structures from the playground, "Juego Circular" (red circle), "Sube y baja Bicolor" and "Columpio Bicolor para niños" (this is the only one well placed) are all next to each other according to the street view. This can be corroborated by checking the blue-floored sports field that can be seen from above.
Hopefully these wayspots get moved (or removed would be better but i've seen in the past they don't meet the removal criteria even though they should've not been accepted in the first place, considering playgrounds should not be separated) and dissappear from both games and the 20m rule gets applied on Ingress as this abusive spot is also used to make farms.
The real location should be around -34.192711, -70.746818.
Comments
So the wayspots got moved to their real location, why are they still showing on Ingress, why isn't the 20m rule applied in these cases?
In-game inclusion rule won't applied to Wayspots relocated through edits. Massive Vietnam cluster back then is the example of this.