It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
Sign In with Ingress Sign In with Pokémon GO
My proposals are refused with the reason "Other rejection criteria" although my requests are legitimate with a good quality picture, a good description and the exact location.
What criteria are you saying it meets? It looks like it’s just a general store. Which means it is not;
So, it’s correct about Other Rejection Criteria on this. Find something eligible and acceptable to submit instead.
This is a generic store that doesn't meet any of the eligibility criteria. That's why it was rejected for "other rejection criteria".
A convenience store is just a poor nomination. The reviewers correctly rejected it. If you are nominating stuff like convenience stores or gas stations (as you complained about getting rejected in a previous discussion), you should expect rejections. Appeals are not going to be successful for coal like that either. Find eligible POI to nominate. Quebec City is hardly lacking in potential high quality wayspots that you could nominate that would meet eligibility criteria.
The r/NianticWayfarer subreddit wiki has a good page about how to nominate hotspot candidates to increase your approval chances.
I think your misunderstanding with respect to the community is founded in a misunderstanding of the eligibility criteria. I’ll grant that Niantic is poor with communication (“other rejection criteria” should be named “does not meet criteria”), but a common convenience store is not an eligible subject, irrespective of image quality or precise pin location. If this store has some kind of unique cultural, historical, or community value, then it is your responsibility as the nominator to state in the supporting information what that value is.