Abuse reporting - Thouarcé - Boulodrome
Title of the Wayspot: Thouarcé - Boulodrome
Location: 47.266946,-0.510344
City: Thouarcé
Country: France
Screenshot of the Rejection Email:
Photos to support your claim:
Additional information:
I am writing this message for several agents who have received the same unjustified warning from the support.
We would like to know if you understand French to allow you to threaten me to suspend the account of several players?
This request for modification follows this subject: https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/discussion/30950/invalid-portal-thouarce-boulodrome/p1
You will find above the title and the description that we have modified.
Do you want me to translate it for you or can using Google Translate suffice?
This modification request is legitimate because this boulodrome is inside the gendarmerie. We are just clarifying an important detail for all the agents so that they do not try to access it because YOU have decided that this gate should remain. We do not question it, it is YOUR choice, no problem. Nevertheless the title and description of a POI must be as precise as possible, especially when the current description is misleading.
We therefore ask you to justify yourself on the warnings that several agents have received while the title or description contains no insult or personal information, only a fact about a location like a bakery, a bar or other.
There is an abuse of reporting on these legitimate edits. It is not the agents requesting these edits that should be warned, but those abusing the flagging by taking advantage of a lack of understanding of the language.
Please lock this topic to avoid unnecessary posts @NianticGiffard @NianticVK
Best Regards
Comments
I will be very interested too to have the answer from Niantic.
For me , your titles and descriptions are more accurate than the actual ones, so they must be accepted.
The actual description "accessible to the public" makes no sense, as it is on a military ground, inside a military base.
Changing that to "not accessible to the public" can be a useful information for preventing people to try to go inside.
To be clear, I think the Waypoint itself is legit and don't need removal or other changes than these suggested by @leFadaDavid-ING
Here's your answer: https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/discussion/31115/wayfarer-abuse-after-appeal-refused#latest
I really wonder why it is abusive to state that something is inside the gendarmerie and it isn't accesible to the public, but it's Niantic so I've learned long ago to ignore the logic.
Thank you for your response.
I am waiting for a precise explanation from @NianticGiffard on this shameful decision based on a false appeal.
Again the current description is misleading and needs to be changed.
Your edits are still in voting.
Yes I have submitted a new proposal which is honest contrary to the warnings received because of lies.
Thank you for your support
Don't forget to take in consideration, that the portal you're **** about is in a " Gendarmerie ", which is a part of the french army. And Nia doesn't care about portals in this kind of area, like " Le 6 " ( and this one, you can interact with it for outside, not like " Le 6 " ).
Don't forget that all players may not have access to all portals, it's in rules.
When you see this modification, it's totally a abuse modification.
And this one. Say that the portal is in a military area. When you play with a portal inside another military area...
And the last one. Say " boring and annoying job " in the description ? Why is it totally legit to write this in a description ?
Moderator Edit: Removed unnecessary phrases and words.
he descriptions you post are no longer proposed and have nothing to do with this topic. I'm not responsible for it.
The description that is being voted on (see @VladDraco-PGO post) is honest in stating that the bowling alley is in a subdivision not accessible to the public contrary to what is stated. You know it, stop wasting everyone's time.
Of course the descriptions above are relevant to this topic since they are the cause for the warnings you received which you are now reporting as abusive.
Anyway, even though I don't really see the usefulness of modifying the description of a POI, why not find a compromise and suggest a description such as this one : "Ce portail, accessible aux joueurs, est associé au boulodrome dans l'enceinte de la gendarmerie non accessible au public." ("this POI, accessible to players, is associated to a bowling alley located within private military grounds." ). At least this one would describe the exact truth.
This is almost word for word the description which is now on voting.
Sorry if it's cut, I have taken a screenshot and I cannot have the whole description and the title suggestion in one shot.
Every other one have been removed.
Receive a warning for screenshot changes to my first post is relevant and normal? Please stop talking nonsense…
Thank you @VladDraco-PGO, it takes a long time to explain to them so that they understand 😅
Hey @leFadaDavid-ING,
As per our policy, we will not be able to provide any specific information related to this warning. We have thoroughly reviewed your submission(s) and found that you have been violating our policies by trying to submit incorrect location edits. As a result, we have notified you about it after our investigation. Please review the Criteria before submitting any contributions/new submissions.
Thanks,
Thank you for your answer @VladDraco-PGO. I still haven't come across those suggestions on Wayfarer and with a partial screenshot, I couldn't have known they were the same but hey, good news! Hope this will settle the problem once and for all.
[READACTED]
@NianticAaron explain me clearly by reading what is written on the screenshots of my first message what does not respect the rules wayfarer?
You are warning a player about this change so detail me the problem.
Best regards,
The proposed title is OK. It says what the wayspot is (a gendarmerie boules court in Thouarcé).
It's the description that is the problem. Whether the nomination is or isn't accessible to the general public is not relevant to the description of the Wayspot. That is information that should have been in the supporting statement when the wayspot was initially submitted, if it actually needed to be anywhere at all.
If you deleted the "non accessible au public", the description would be perfectly valid. That is just extraneous information that's entirely irrelevant to the wayspot. It's obviously in an area that is used by the gendarmerie, as that's mentioned in both the title and the description, and there's clearly fences that surround the area, so people should be able to see for themselves whether they should or shouldn't be going in there. They do not need you to be telling them this information. It is still accessible by some people some of the time though, so it's a perfectly valid wayspot.