Abuse or just inexperience?
Got a submission, from about 2 years ago, recently rejected and it was marked as abuse. 😲
I'll hold my hands up, over 2 years ago I honestly believed - in good faith - those UK green public footpath markers were eligible so I submitted a couple (maybe 3 if I recall 😬). I didn't know any better. 🤷♀️
For the last year and a half I've known they are not eligible given the discussions on here. They are not real trail markers. In fact even yesterday I was rejecting them from others.
So a couple of questions...
- What does having a nom marked as 'abuse' do to your account? And,
- Any plans to have the date of the nominator submission appear on the review screen?
As a reviewer, the latter would help me make a more informed choice with reason selection when rejecting obvious ones like EIIR postbox (mailbox) royal cyphers - did they know or are they trying it on?
Thanks in advance.