Foot Bridges and historical cultural significance?
DrgnTrnrBerlioz-PGO
Posts: 23 ✭✭
To me most foot bridges don't really have any kind of historical or cultural significance, like one on a trail that is old down trodden, unless it's been there for a certain amount of years and has some kind of plaque, am I wrong in thinking this?
Comments
I think of it more as the importance that a bridge exists at all. Usually they are placed to allow access to places otherwise inaccessible or dangerous. They allow people to explore and encourage people to walk/ exercise to reach new places. They make travel much more coinvent and so help society.
I see. In this way it's more of a cultural thing in how we adapt to our environment.
I believe generally speaking, any footbridge, boardwalk or boarded footpath is an eligible nomination if located on a walking/hiking/biking trail. These are usually found in a park. The reason (correct me if I am mistaken) is they serve an an anchor point to the trail and encourage outdoor exploration and exercise. I nominate these frequently when I visit parks or I am on a trail designed for exercise. I have only one that was denied (for pedestrian access nonetheless which makes no sense since it's between the trailhead sign and the lookout structure).
However, a footbridge at an apartment complex (or other generic area) for example leading from a parking lot to the housing area would not be eligible. This type doesn't promote exercise or add anything to the community from a exploration standpoint. I'm sure there are exceptions.
Does this link help?
@Synchro2112-ING interesting thread I will have to read through it but it seems to have a good discussion. Thanks.