change of location, appeal
Common items for all invalid Wayspots
- City: Seoul
- Country: South Korea (Republic of Korea)
https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/discussion/34994/0/#Form_Comment
In order to move the gym in the corresponding cell to another place, the user seems to be trying to create conditions for the gym by pushing the existing Pokestops out of the cell or deleting the implemented Pokestops.
Google Maps is also used for PokeStops applications. Kakao Map is not printed. I applied for a 'pocket stop' using Google Maps, which has poor accuracy, but if I bring Kakao Map and present my opinion, of course, isn't it a normal person's idea that the location will be slightly different? manager?
!! Please note. !!
Check the body of the link.
일.죽 = ilijuk
The content written on the subject shown in the photo is 'Iljuk'
I was suspended for 30 days on the wayfarer because my nickname was similar to this in Korean.
my nickname - @1jjuk-PGO
i'm embarrassed. Please attach a nickname change ticket once. I will change nickname
Among the attached links, I will not ask you to edit the title. but, Request an objection to the movement of other wayspots.
I applied for a way spot with this in mind. All of the way spots I applied for were those that did not need to move from that location.
he corresponding 'way spots' are 'playground' and 'Rest area'. Since the distance between other 'wayspots' is close, we requested a 'wayspot' starting from the 'Rest area'. Therefore, it is difficult to understand that the author applied for a deliberate location based on the location of the playground equipment provided by the author. This intentionally made the user who applied for wayspot malicious.
After making very small changes to the latitude and longitude you want to change, you comment that the wayspot location is incorrect.
Before moving, it was a very accurate location in-game.
7.4m Agree to bypass. As a result of checking the IITC, the application was made in a place that had the same playground as the cell, a space of 7.4m where the statue was visible, and where it was clearly visible.
Explain that all locations where I applied for a wayspot are identifiable locations.
The author of the move forced the wayspot to be moved to another cell in order to remove it from the Pokemon Go in-game. Is this a necessary move?
This is the gap in the picture. If this distance is expressed as malicious, many 'way spots' should be deleted.
When I applied for 'Wayspot', I applied for the location where the signboard of the building was located, and Google Roadview was passing there. This is a natural, not intentional, wayspot application. Rather, I think it is more unreasonable to apply inside the building.
The 'way spot' located at the front of the building plays a sufficient role with its location. However, by submitting a malicious reason, the 'way spot', which does not require movement, was forcibly moved.
Explain that all locations where I applied for a wayspot are identifiable locations.
This is a very absurd move request. Is this a necessary move?
This 'way spot' cell has another way spot, so it is located a little west of the detour. After all, now, two way spots coexist in one cell. Did you want this situation?
It must be capable of being a permanent, physically identifiable place or object, or an indication of its surroundings.
-yes- However, the admin moved this one.
Explain that all locations where I applied for a wayspot are identifiable locations.
Check out the satellite photos and the photos of the site of the move above.
The playground is very spacious. A wayspot was requested where the playground was located, but this user moved it to get rid of the Pokestop. As a result of this conclusion, PokeStops were removed from the in-game.
The position of the swing is very accurate. However, he pointed to the ride next to it and accused it of being in the wrong place.
Just checking the street view he linked to will confirm that the swing is in its original location.
Moving this one is a clear violation.
You are moving the position of the wayspot even though it is within range of the playground. And it says that the person who applied was wrong.
If you look at the satellite, you can see the inside of the playground.
Manager, I didn't sign up for the rides. The candidate I applied for is "Ground". playground
Missing numbers on appeal items do not oppose the outcome of the move.
The appeal request appears to be nothing more than a request for a relatively short 'head-to-tail' shift.
I hope the 'past location' will be restored, as you deceived me with malicious remarks. I have no problems with my past and present positions, but I have a feeling they are cheating on me.
Manager. From this time on, I will not make any further application or modification of Wayspot.
However, I think what needs to be corrected must be corrected. Do not agree with the request for movement by linking the Kakao Map, but look at the boundaries of the land marked with pictures. Also, please check how many AR scans have been submitted for the currently moved pokestops.
< growgi_PGO > Please remove Wayfarer permission from his accounts. Must make sure he can no longer fool the reviewers and moderators.
He is disguising his fairness, removing Pokestops. Please confirm before confirming the move.
![[크기변환]FGJHFG.png](https://us.v-cdn.net/6032079/uploads/2CPEAZ77WWLW/5b-ed-81-ac-ea-b8-b0-eb-b3-80-ed-99-98-5dfgjhfg.png)
![[크기변환]20.jpg](https://us.v-cdn.net/6032079/uploads/G2JUG8QI8ASH/5b-ed-81-ac-ea-b8-b0-eb-b3-80-ed-99-98-5d20.jpg)
![[크기변환][크기변환]saefseaf.png](https://us.v-cdn.net/6032079/uploads/LTBBXWIUUNH1/5b-ed-81-ac-ea-b8-b0-eb-b3-80-ed-99-98-5d-5b-ed-81-ac-ea-b8-b0-eb-b3-80-ed-99-98-5dsaefseaf.png)





![[크기변환][크기변환]7.jpg](https://us.v-cdn.net/6032079/uploads/Y2OLUDX3PYI2/5b-ed-81-ac-ea-b8-b0-eb-b3-80-ed-99-98-5d-5b-ed-81-ac-ea-b8-b0-eb-b3-80-ed-99-98-5d7.jpg)



![[크기변환]111.png](https://us.v-cdn.net/6032079/uploads/Y44ZO94KCMK0/5b-ed-81-ac-ea-b8-b0-eb-b3-80-ed-99-98-5d111.png)

![[크기변환][크기변환]13.jpg](https://us.v-cdn.net/6032079/uploads/NKXCTP6PW12H/5b-ed-81-ac-ea-b8-b0-eb-b3-80-ed-99-98-5d-5b-ed-81-ac-ea-b8-b0-eb-b3-80-ed-99-98-5d13.jpg)
![[크기변환][크기변환]14.jpg](https://us.v-cdn.net/6032079/uploads/M2USYI4IZRWF/5b-ed-81-ac-ea-b8-b0-eb-b3-80-ed-99-98-5d-5b-ed-81-ac-ea-b8-b0-eb-b3-80-ed-99-98-5d14.jpg)
![[크기변환]15.jpg](https://us.v-cdn.net/6032079/uploads/9M2907DZAUQ8/5b-ed-81-ac-ea-b8-b0-eb-b3-80-ed-99-98-5d15.jpg)


Comments
no.23 After reading this article, I have a question. 'Playground' means land. 'slide' shouldn't be the norm. If so, I think 'wayspot' should be named 'slide'. The request for movement before the appeal in this article is a case where all 'playgrounds' have been moved based on 'slide'.
@NianticGiffard @NianticAtlas @NianticLC @NianticOtoStar
I'm curious about your opinion.
I reading your article and the article you objected to (https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/discussion/34994/0/#Form_Comment) and leave a question.
No. 9, since two way spots exist in one cell, isn't it enough to delete one way spot?
No.13, isn't it correct to apply for the exact location of the exercise equipment separately from the wide playground?
@Seojin26-PGO No.9 and 13 existed as 1 wayspot in each 1cell, but were moved to 1 cell 2 way spot through the publisher of the link and deleted in-game. I will tell you that it is a location that can be checked with the **** eye without having to move.
no. 13 In this case, the wayspot was located at the end of the exercise equipment, but it was moved to a place close to the other way spot. 1----/----0 (The wayspot was moved from exercise equipment 0 to equipment 1, '/' This is the cell boundary)