Removed fountain

Title of the Wayspot: Fonte De San Pedro


Location: 42.881504,-8.534996


City: Santiago de Compostela


Country: Spain


Screenshot of the Rejection Email: 

 



Original photo of the portal

 


Actual photo of the street where the fountain was located.

 

Recently the street has been renovated. As a result of this, the old fountain was removed.

Could you please remove the wayspot?

Tagged:

Comments

  • Trekolas-INGTrekolas-ING Posts: 43 ✭✭

    @NianticLC Could you look at this post?

  • Policlates-INGPoliclates-ING Posts: 76 ✭✭✭

    Hello, recent works on the site have caused this fountain to be moved a few meters from its original location.

    The fountain still exists, but has been relocated a few meters as can be seen in the photos.

    In one of the photos you can see where it is now and where it was before.


    I indicate the new coordinates so that they can place the wayspot in the correct place, thanks.: 42.881579, -8.535054

    I request the moderators of the community to take action against the two previous participants of this post.

    There are several posts in which they try to manipulate the information received by the community.

  • Trekolas-INGTrekolas-ING Posts: 43 ✭✭
    edited October 2022

    Nice to see your comment here. And that you agreed with the creator of the post that the wayspot is not in its original location.

    It's the first time I saw a user of the community request actions against other user because one of the admins was mentioned 😍.

    I really appreciate your commitment to the wayfarer community. Your posts and comments are always redacted in this way.

    Best regards

  • Policlates-INGPoliclates-ING Posts: 76 ✭✭✭
    edited October 2022


    It is impossible to agree with the author of a publication whose title is "Removed fountain".

    The fountain is on the same street where it has always been but opposite its previous location. Less than 10 meters without buildings, cars or urban furniture that makes vision difficult.

    I request actions against both members because they are both players who frequent that area and know that the source has not been eliminated at any time.

    If a member mentions a moderator to review a post knowing that the information provided is false he is contributing to the manipulation.... and as I have already commented, this is not the first post where both members do this.

  • AmFreqzMod-INGAmFreqzMod-ING Posts: 42 ✭✭

    It is really lovely to see how our use of the shakespeare language is improving thanks to Ingress. This is something that I would never had anticipated and another great reason to play Ingress.

    FYI: @MoskaCojonera-PGO

  • Thanks for the appeal, @Trepator77-ING! Based on the evidence provided, we’ve made the necessary changes to the Wayspot's location.

Sign In or Register to comment.