Wayspot rejected

Why is this signpost rejected, normally it would have to be accepted. The reviewers do not notice that there is a number 79 on the bottom right next to the Rotbachweg. How can I make it better so that it can be accepted


  • 82quuu-PGO82quuu-PGO Posts: 211 ✭✭✭

    Could you paste the explanation and supplementary explanation so that I can read it with the translation function?

  • Waffelstick25-INGWaffelstick25-ING Posts: 15 ✭✭

    In the Netherlands such similar signposts are accepted and in Germany the signposts are hardly accepted or often/always rejected. These signposts with the number below have been newly equipped or set up in Germany in recent years. In addition, such signposts must be adopted in Germany as Wayspot, because they are signposted routes from respective places

  • TWVer-INGTWVer-ING Posts: 551 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Focus your primary picture more on the actual trail markers, not all the signs, so people know what you are nominating. That also makes it easier to keep cars out of the picture.

    Don't copy paste your description from a website. Create your own description, and add something about that specific location. Rather include a link to the website you copied the description from, to help people verify the location.

    Explain that the map on that site shows that the trail makes a right turn there, matching what they can see in the photo. You might also mention the Shell in the supporting photo, as a Shell can be seen on the Google map.

  • Waffelstick25-INGWaffelstick25-ING Posts: 15 ✭✭
    edited March 10

    Again the same signpost rejected, it can't be true, every time this sign is rejected

  • Elijustrying-INGElijustrying-ING Posts: 2,716 Ambassador

    Hi did you follow @TWVer-ING suggestion and retake photo so that the bike signs fill the image.

    It’s a bit rough as it’s from a screen shot, but the focus is now on the subject and not others road stuff. You should now see bike symbol easier too

Sign In or Register to comment.