I've done one post prior, and as mentioned I'm new. I'm getting quite a few nominations coming up over again in exactly the same area. As an example you can see in this posted picture.
"**** to the veterinary clinic it's called" 🙄. When I reviewed it the last time it was the clinic itself, and I believe I gave it a 3 or 4, but adjusted the location.
The poster again mentions few poke stops in the area, and I can sympathize, but this time around it feels like BS (excuse my language) especially as old location is used just outside the same residential building.
Obviously, I'm rejecting, but is this where it becomes one of the fake nominations instead of other or mismatched? I see quite a few of them? I don't want to mess up to much, so any feedback is appreciated.
It's not fake, it's just not eligible. Welcome to Wayfarer. This is why so many people struggle to review, because submitters don't care about (or know) the criteria and just submit anything they see near them.
Also, I wouldn't have approved the vet's office. IMO, it doesn't meet any if the 3 criteria to be social, to explore, or to exercise. It's just a place people go.
Only reason I was thinking fake (but, I understand it's not) is because this nomination, as the other I reviewed, was placed just outside the doors of the same private property about 30 meters away.
In regards to the clinic itself: in this area, pretty agricultural with loads of life stock, I was giving it the doubt of benefit.
Thanks for the clarification 😊
Es un fake mas o menos comun, es decir, colocar propuestas convenientemente a la distancia de que POGO **** permita ser wayspots en POGO