20/29 Usson-Du-Poitou - France - Fake/faux Portails/pokestop
Soccalala-PGO
Posts: 46 ✭✭✭
fraxinus excelsior
Localisation
46.271997,0.579225
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.27200621634791,0.5791734158992767&z=19
Issue.
Tree on private property.
No other way to identify, no additional photos and no satellite access.
The point of interest of multiple duplicates. The bark of the tree systematically has the same similarities. The same single tree can be found at the same time in several places.
Strictly identical doubles same plate same shaft
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=48.611446,2.501903&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.557922,0.384396&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=48.642006,2.504462&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.271997,0.579225&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.56209,0.360174&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.581761,0.191076&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.560715,0.366587&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.479957,0.36568&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.026993,0.192908&z=15
Conclusion.
The point of interest should not have been validated but refused at least for four reasons: does not exist at the place indicated, false proposal, duplicate, Farm.
—-
Problème.
Arbre sur une propriété privée.
Aucun autre moyen pour identifié, pas de photos supplémentaires et pas d’accès satellite.
Le point d’intérêt de multiple doublon. L’écorce de l’arbre à systématiquement les mêmes similitudes. Le même arbre unique se trouvent en même temps à plusieurs endroits.
Les doubles strictement identiques même plaque même arbre
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=48.611446,2.501903&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.557922,0.384396&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=48.642006,2.504462&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.271997,0.579225&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.56209,0.360174&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.581761,0.191076&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.560715,0.366587&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.479957,0.36568&z=15
https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=46.026993,0.192908&z=15
Conclusion.
Le point d’intérêt n’aurait pas dû être validé mais refusé au moins pour quatre justifications : n’existe pas à l’endroit indiqué, fausse proposition, doublon, Ferme.
Comments
Thanks for the appeal, @Soccalala-PGO. After reviewing the additional evidence provided, we’ve decided to retire the Wayspot in question and have taken action on the Wayfinder in accordance with our policies.