Incorrect reason for rejection
MusicMovesMe2-PGO
Posts: 2 ✭
Submitted a potential wayspot. Reviewer rejected it, saying it was a place of residence. It is not. Nobody lives there, nor could they live there. No bed, water, toilet, or stove. It was built as a community centre for meetings and storage. If the reviewer knew the community, they would understand that their rejection is groundless. Don't see an option to appeal the Mayan Seaside Community Centre. Please explain what course of action I should take. This remote area has very, very few wayspots. Thank you.
Best Answers
-
HankWolfman-PGO
Posts: 4,304 ✭✭✭✭✭
If you're not seeing the appeal button, it's because you've used another appeal recently. You need to wait 30 days from when you used your most recent appeal before you can submit a new one.
Regarding the nomination, is there any sign that says it's a community centre? Or some other evidence like a website?
-
tp235-ING
Posts: 1,324 ✭✭✭✭✭
The pictures are not that good.
With this photo, it is no wonder that some people have decided that it is a residence and not a community center.
It would be a good idea to take a photo that shows the name of the community center on the photo so that reviewers will not be misled into thinking it is a residence.
Answers
If you're not seeing the appeal button, it's because you've used another appeal recently. You need to wait 30 days from when you used your most recent appeal before you can submit a new one.
Regarding the nomination, is there any sign that says it's a community centre? Or some other evidence like a website?
The pictures are not that good.
With this photo, it is no wonder that some people have decided that it is a residence and not a community center.
It would be a good idea to take a photo that shows the name of the community center on the photo so that reviewers will not be misled into thinking it is a residence.
Thank you very much for the insightful comments and suggestions.