Incorrect reason for rejection
Submitted a potential wayspot. Reviewer rejected it, saying it was a place of residence. It is not. Nobody lives there, nor could they live there. No bed, water, toilet, or stove. It was built as a community centre for meetings and storage. If the reviewer knew the community, they would understand that their rejection is groundless. Don't see an option to appeal the Mayan Seaside Community Centre. Please explain what course of action I should take. This remote area has very, very few wayspots. Thank you.