Another appeal rejected despite on proofs
a1mirr-ING
Posts: 59 ✭✭✭
It's amazing. I've added to the appeal direct link to the panorama with an object clearly visible [default was an old one], but it's still rejected due to inaccurate location.
Submission image of appeal reject:
Panorama link provided in the appeal. Unfortunately, there is no way to check what exactly was written in the appeal description, but I'm 100% sure I've added the panorama link due to initial rejection reason (mismatched location)
It's not the first appeal with such a poor quality of review. I've already created the topic with other examples from my appeal history, but it was ignored.
Once again: we have only one appeal per month, and we deserve a better review.
Comments
Whilst I agree that mismatched location is not correct, this appears to be on the side of a private residential property.
I'm not sure why my reply got a disagree. If you look at this side of the building, it looks very much like a single family private residential property.
And as has been stated by Niantic in the past:
Our take has been that candidates on private family residential property are ineligible. This includes outward facing boundary walls that are part of the residence or otherwise on the privately owned residential land.