See the "i" in ""Pedestrian Access"/"Appropriate" ( if reverted), "Restricted" is allowed along with "Ticketed". It is still publicly accessible to some degree but not for all. AMA discussed this in CQ2.
No wayspot is accessible to everyone, prerequisites for access may exist when traveling at other locations.
There's a format for invalid appeal requests, the other threads may show this.
Icequeen0730-PGO
Posts: 7 ✭
Comments
This is not an invalid wayspot appeal. I'm not sure what you were trying to do, but it doesn't belong in this section.
I sincerely apologize I am new with this and trying to figure this out.
I was trying to create a poll asking if an explanation for a rejection of a Wayspot believed to be invalid should be provided in the rejection email.
Niantic clearly states in both acceptance criteria and rejection criteria WaySpots have to be Publicly Accessible to pedestrians.
I submitted this stop as an ineligible WayStop because it is NOT Publicly accessible, it’s private to only a few people.
I don’t believe a stop should be allowed if it’s not Publicly accessible and my submission for the ineligible stop was rejected.
Clarity on how to correctly make posts would be greatly appreciated please.
See the "i" in ""Pedestrian Access"/"Appropriate" ( if reverted), "Restricted" is allowed along with "Ticketed". It is still publicly accessible to some degree but not for all. AMA discussed this in CQ2.
No wayspot is accessible to everyone, prerequisites for access may exist when traveling at other locations.
There's a format for invalid appeal requests, the other threads may show this.