Does a poorly maintained sign loses it's elegibility?
PonzioKetchup-PGO
Posts: 5 ✭✭
Hi folks,
Can you give me your 2 cents about this one?
It´s a sign from the town hall reverencing all the woman that helped to build the city.
It's located right below a woman's statue that is already a POI, and I got it rejected 3 times with this reasons:
"Photo is low quality (e.g., pitch black/blurry photos or photos taken from a car), The nomination does not appear to be visually unique."
So, I understand that it's a valid POI, but unfortunatelly it's old. Does a anything can gets ineligible due to "the time" and a poorly maintenance?
Tagged:
Comments
It shouldn't, but obviously it did.
Is there any way you can contact the group that created the placard and request it be renovated?
In addition to getting it renovated- if it's below a statue that's already a POI... It sounds like it wouldn't show up in any games anyway (within 20m of an existing POI) or am I misunderstanding something?
Thanks for the ideia. I requested it, but I am hopeless that the town hall will spend money on it in a near time.
It´s like a mini plaza, the statue POI is located behind it(close to the semaphore(2nd photo)), and I requested it in front of the sign, where exists a sidewalk and you have a straight vision to the sign(just where i took the 2nd photo). It's exactly 21 meters of distance.
"Photo is low quality (e.g., pitch black/blurry photos or photos taken from a car), The nomination does not appear to be visually unique."
If you got the "visually unique" rejection, you got at least a few people who didn't give it a 1* outright but gave low marks to that category. I did get the "cultural significance" once. I redid the nomination by slightly drawing out the significance and it passed with ease.
For the "photo is low quality," it genuinely should not have been rejected for that, but I've heard of people who use "selfie sticks" to get better quality / better oriented photos of hard to reach objects above general arm reach.