Should this object be a pokesotop?

Examerize-PGOExamerize-PGO Posts: 4 ✭✭✭
edited July 2020 in Nomination Improvement

Thank you //Trianer name Examerize

Post edited by Examerize-PGO on


  • TheFarix-PGOTheFarix-PGO Posts: 4,734 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No. It is on the side of a road in what appears to be an intersection with no sidewalk or other footpath, therefore it lacks safe pedestrian access.

  • AScarletSabre-PGOAScarletSabre-PGO Posts: 754 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Whilst soft verges can constitute safe pedestrian access, depending on the category of road, you haven't really told us what your nomination is supposed to be. Could you translate? Describe the object. I'm not yet convinced your nomination is anything special.

  • sogNinjaman-INGsogNinjaman-ING Posts: 3,313 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No pedestrian access. Home made sign. No.

  • SoulKing95-PGOSoulKing95-PGO Posts: 43 ✭✭✭

    The reason this object shouldn't be accepted as Pokestop:

    • Signs can't be eligible by it's own.
    • Signs taken as representation of particular place written on the sign itself.
    • It only show direction, nothing interesting.
    • It doesn't meet any criteria.

    Please stop using "no safe pedestrian access" as rejection reason since in most case, it's a weak argument. This reason strongly applicable only for extreme cases like in a middle of a lake, middle of a highway/toll, in busy roundabout without crosswalk, etc. Do use another strong or absolute rejection reason for preventing useless discussion.

  • TwoSkunks-PGOTwoSkunks-PGO Posts: 28 ✭✭

    The Streetview shows compacted soil at the edge of the pavement and the soil on the road clearly shows the wheel path. This is not a location I would recommend walking or standing.

Sign In or Register to comment.