Need Feedback on submitter trail markers

I have submitted 4 missing trail markers from my local park/open space. In total there are 7 of them and only 3 of them are waypoints. The other 4 are under trees and were probably missed because not many visitors know about this hidden path, so I thought it would make for some great submissions.

Well it turns out the community don’t think so, as I’ve wasted 3 upgrades on 3 of the 4 nominations so far.

Admittedly, the first 2 didn’t have great supporting info and went into voting before I could add more supporting info. But the third time I upgraded one of them with as much info as I could it still gets rejected for not meeting criteria.

What am I doing wrong and what can I do to improve the chances of my nomination?

I should probably add after the first one was declined for not meeting criteria and location did not have sufficient evidence I went and created photospheres for each one to try and help improve their chances.


  • LukeAllStars-INGLukeAllStars-ING Posts: 4,619 Ambassador

    I think, trailmarkers are like a 35%:65% chance of getting accepted:decliened. Im personally not the biggest fan of trailmarkers. And if there are too many in a close area, it looses its uniqueness. I personally would not try it again, as long as you need to upgrade them.

  • TorvoTeratos-PGOTorvoTeratos-PGO Posts: 161 ✭✭✭
    edited October 2020

    When you re-submit them, I would take a closer picture so we can actually read the trail name on the sign. =)

    EDIT: I see this was accidentally posted twice and there's more answers in the other thread. Just ignore. ^^

Sign In or Register to comment.