Welcome to the Bug Reporting page! Please refer to these tips when submitting new bug reports:
1. Browse the known issues section or check if another user previously posted about a similar issue.
2. Upvoting posts help us understand how many players are experiencing the bug.
3. Refer to the Best Practices to learn how to write a bug report.
4. File each issue separately if you’ve encountered multiple issues.
1. Browse the known issues section or check if another user previously posted about a similar issue.
2. Upvoting posts help us understand how many players are experiencing the bug.
3. Refer to the Best Practices to learn how to write a bug report.
4. File each issue separately if you’ve encountered multiple issues.
Location Edit Review : multiple points not initialized
ULtraGreG24-PGO
Posts: 28 ✭✭
in Report a Bug
When a new request for the relocation of a POI is proposed, the points of the previous reviews are always proposed. This means that we end up with reviews of ten points in the end. Once the relocation has been accepted or not, you must reset the previous points, and to propose for a new review only the current point and the new proposal.
I see reviews going several times for the same POI, and each time there is an additional point proposed. It gets very messy, and almost impossible to choose well.
I will post examples as soon as I encounter them again.
Comments
Really where is the fountain ??
I have already review this fountain, and each time one more POINT is purposed.
If anyone adds another edit proposal while it's in voting then it resets and the new proposal is added. I think that if the previous vote would have ended then next edit proposal would start over with only the current location and the new proposal.
Maybe someone is abusing that in order to prevent a location edit (or they are clueless and they keep on nominating and wondering why it takes so long)
This is an example of the consequences of having something taking too long in the system.
it can be a downward spiral as the longer something takes because there is too much in the system to make it flow smoothly, the greater the risk that more will be added in. This in turn slows the system further and so on.
Niantic and the Wayfarer team appear to be not concerned about the speed of flow which various enormously depending on where you are. This has a negative effect on wayfarer and on the database so they should try to improve the system to try and ensure a more consistent flow.