Parks, plazas, forests

pakoesilvia13-PGO

Hello

According to new criteria it seems plaza, forest and parks are eligible.

However it is not clear to me whether for all a Plaque, a sign is required.

For instance for forests if I do a pic of trees it would be natural feature...

For parks if I do only the entrance without a plaque normally it was rejected. Plazas were rejected in any cases...

What is really changing now?

P.s. do you have other examples of something that before it was rejected and now becomes acceptable?

Thanks

HaramDingo-ING

One of the things people forget in the new Criteria tab is that there are four sub tabs:

• Eligibility Criteria
• Acceptance Criteria
• Rejection Criteria
• Content Guidelines

While you might be reading only Eligibility Criteria, you also need to see the Acceptance Criteria, where it cites that it must meet the following acceptance criteria. For parks, plazas and forests:

Must be a permanent physical, tangible, and identifiable place or object, or object that placemarks an area

So a supporting sign, plaque would be recommended as well. Hope that helps!

gazzas89-ING

https://community.wayfarer.nianticlabs.com/discussion/comment/46738#Comment_46738

Based On that though, an entrance gate to a park, sign or not, would be eligible no? Its a tangible physical object