Supporting info - reject based on "need more pokestop" claims?

I'm a relatively new reviewer and still trying to get a feel for some of the rules - both explicit & cultural around what we should & shouldn't accept.

I see a lot of requests like this one:

I'm 50-50 on this being a stop if I exclude the supporting info, but the player left a message that's clearly irrelevant to the criteria, and it tends to make me want to downvote this more than I might otherwise.

How much weight should I put on submissions that try to justify their existence by leaning into "we need more pokestops here" or "other things like this have pokestops" or "this is close to gyms/stops"??? Should I ignore this, or actually consider it in my evaluation process?

Thanks!

Comments

Sign In or Register to comment.