Threats with supplementary information?
I just came across this nomination and I think the last sentence of the supplementary explanation is a big problem.
I've just come across this nomination, and I think the last sentence of the supplementary explanation is a big problem: "I've heard that even on the review side, there are penalties for wrong reviews, so please make sure your review is accurate."
The last sentence of the supplementary explanation is a big problem.
As far as I know, there is only one case where the reviewers were penalized, and that was when they approved a fake church again after it was deleted once.
This sentence could be taken to mean that if you don't approve this nomination, you will be punished, and this could be seen as an act of coercion to force approval. I think it is the applicant who should be punished...please investigate.
As a side note, there is certainly no street view. But no 360-degree photos have been posted either, and it's no wonder they've been rejected for location discrepancies many times.
And somehow, the photos don't look like they were taken locally. The background looks blurry, and it looks like something else was taken in the photo.