Why was this route marker wayspot rejected?
WaterMortar-PGO
Posts: 2 ✭
Title of the Wayspot: [Wandertour 3 - westlicher Eingang Steinbachtal]
Location: [53.333102/9.860688]
City: [Buchholz in der Nordheide]
Country: [Germany]
Screenshot of the Rejection Email: [
]
Photos to support your claim: [
]
Additional information: [I know this isn’t the most fanciest of POIs but it is an important route marker for an official hiking trail. And the critique of the alignment of the photo I took is just ridiculous. I took a photo of the route marker head on, no distortions. I have no control over the growth direction of the vegetation around.
So I ask you mildly annoyed to reconsider my submission.
Cheers.
]
Tagged:
Comments
Nomination appeals are not accepted. You have to resubmit.
That is an ordinary traffic sign.
This does not meet any criteria. It’s a mass produced traffic sign, not a trail marker.
It’s not the traffic sign I took a photo off, it’s the "3" and or the white "X" und black ground as they are trail markers for hiking trails.
Thank you @Volsungo-ING . I’ll resubmit and try my luck, again - maybe with an even more detailed description.
Invalid Appeal - Thanks for the appeal, Trainer. We're not currently reviewing PokéStop submissions. Please resubmit the nomination by improving its title/description if you feel that it was a valid nomination.