The reasons for rejecting are not clear
uriy55RUS-ING
Posts: 4 ✭✭
Please tell me what else is needed to finally avoid these ridiculous reasons for rejection? There is a panorama on which the object is clearly visible (it can even be seen from a satellite image), but it is rejected because of the "inability to determine the accuracy of the location", the inscription on the plate on which it says "To the Hero of the Soviet Union" is clearly visible, but it is rejected because "it has no historical value"... what else is needed?
And the second question is where to write on the forum to punish such appraisers (this is the 6th time they reject this object)?
Comments
So you have a little plaque that commemorates something historic, ok that seems reasonable enough. I personally know nothing about said "Hero", and I definitely don't know enough about your local culture to guess, but whatever.
But it's a TINY plaque. Where exactly IS it? Your closeup photo definitely doesn't match anything in the distant shots.
Very specifically, the closeup has an obvious floral arrangement placed on a shelf. The distant shots do NOT have that same arrangement. Reviewers are VERY wary of shenanigans, and even though the plaque and shelf may be BLURRILY visible in your supporting photos, those don't match the object you've pictured in the closeup.
...
If it contains pictures or photos, it has to be approved before showing up.
everything would be fine, but what does "it is impossible to determine the location" have to do with it?
by the way, here is an additional photo
and once again a screenshot from the panorama
well, yes, it's not the same thing at all...
Possibly reviewers couldn't tell where the plaque was, because the supporting photo isn't sharp and it blends with the wall. Hence, "impossible to determine location." Why didn't you just take the photos at the same time with the flowers? You might use that new photo and try again.
Try to submit again with the the text you don't have a camera with 360° photosphere. Thats clear.