Why ruin this with a silly description
Damastaglen-PGO
Posts: 124 ✭✭✭
Hi all
I just had this come in my list to approve which seemed like a great nomination until saw the title / description.
I rejected it based on title/description and have no idea what the submitter means about a local frog. I do not think this to be the case but was I too harsh or did they legitimately ruin a good nomination?
thanks
Comments
Wait until one more nomination come from that area in-review. If the Frog appeared again, you should keep an eye on that area.
I would not have out and out rejected it. I would have accepted the Wayspot, rated poorly the title with the hopes that it would go through and have someone who actually knows better submit an edit for the title and description. The subject matter itself is worthy however.
The title is pretty bad, but the supporting information is what would give me the most pause. I think I would reject for Abuse: insulting or harassing other players. (Remember that "frog" is a nickname for the green Ingress faction.)
I wouldnt have failed, maybe gave 2 or 3 star to description/title. But keep an eye out for that supporting thing about frogs again, it's an ingress insidet name for the green team, he's probably insulting that player
"Frog" is a reference to one of the two Ingress teams. Enlightened and Resistance, Green and Blue, Frogs and Smurfs.
I thinkI would reject for Abuse: insulting or harassing other players. (Remember that "frog" is a nickname for the green Ingress faction.)This.
I would have done the same. Reject
Clearly worth the rejection for exactly the reason you chose.